Differences Samsung Galaxy S3 vs. Nokia Lumia 900

Antartika Raya - After the successful release of the Samsung Galaxy S2, the successor, the Galaxy S3, a phone that many digadang fans this year. So when the Galaxy S3 actually slid into the market a few months ago, the phones are the headlines of various media. Moreover, Galaxy S3 to be one of the few phones with quad-core processors.
On the other hand, although not the first Nokia phone with the operating system Microsoft Windows Phone, Lumia 900 still discussed everywhere. Because Lumia series is the spearhead for Nokia to regain its market continued to erode.
After leaving the Symbian operating system that has been raised - used Symbian smart phone series Nokia Communicator family as the legendary - Windows Phone is the future for Nokia.
Well, what if the spearhead Samsung, Galaxy S3, pitted with the Nokia flagship phone, Lumia 900? First, the light that distinguishes the two is the operating system. Lumia 900 running Windows Phone 7.5 aka Mango, while Samsung install Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich on the Galaxy S3.

Determining which one is better between the two operating systems can be ignited debate berlarat-Larat. In many cases, the assessment of the two operating systems is highly dependent subjectivity alias tastes.
Some prefer the fresh face of Windows Phone, but some are like the customization on Android. But if we are only talking about the stock application, the amount of light in the Android app is still much higher than in the Windows Phone Marketplace.
DesignWhen the Galaxy S3 was shown the first time, one of the oblique comments about this phone is the design. Selection of plastic material - according to Samsung, polycarbonate - disappointed many analysts. They compared the design of Galaxy S3 is the perfect iPhone series.
In the matter of design, not least by rating PCWorld, Lumia 900 is superior to the Galaxy S3. Lumia 900 assembled in one whole block with a shiny polymer material. With this material, scratches all over his body Lumia 900 will be disguised.
ScreenSadly, pretty design Lumia 900 is not counterbalanced by the superior quality of the screen. In addition to their smaller size, only 4.3 inches - Galaxy S3 screen 0.5 inches wider - Lumia 900 screen resolution is very low compared to Galaxy S3 screen.
The number of pixels per inch on the Lumia 900 only 217 306 in the Galaxy S3 opponent. The higher the number of pixels, the detail screen image.
ProcessorWith quad-core Samsung Exynos Quad, bright Galaxy S3 processor is more powerful than the Lumia 900 in terms of processing speed. Although it does not mean the processor Lumia 900 arguably slow.
Sometimes, especially for standard features, it's hard to feel the difference between a mobile phone with quad-core processors with single-core as used Lumia 900.
For normal use, the battery Galaxy S3, Lithium-ion 2100 mAh, longer lasting than belonging Lumia 900, Lithium-ion 1830 mAh. But remember, speed and a bright screen like yours S3 also has the potential to suck the battery quickly.
CameraBoth have a main camera with a resolution of 8 megapixels. Some media, such as Cnet, assess weaknesses Lumia 900 camera is in lighting. But if you are in an environment with abundant light, Lumia 900 camera no matter. According to Cnet testing, Galaxy S3 camera works quite well, indoor or outdoor.